🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume nuclear discussions with the United States on condition that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said only diplomacy was effective, and shared new appeals had been made by go-betweens to restart discussions with the US government. He said Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to visit attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

Araghchi is navigating a challenging route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be operating from a situation of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more resilient defensively and mentally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Previous Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that ended with the American leader claiming the locations had been eliminated. Following this, EU nations employed their authority to reinstate international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the arrangement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Current Position

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the proposal could be revived in certain ways if negotiations restart.

The US president last week said he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet receiving clear proposals from the United States either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his address to the gathering, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He said the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were executed with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust challenging to restore.

Dialogue Remains the Primary Solution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the European states that had consistently attempted to dictate their demands during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be alive and continues the primary resolution to settle conflicts, but its standards, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"Provided that they address to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and recovery, Araghchi stated he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We acquired multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He added: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if destroyed, will be restored; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but were unable to shatter. The nation of Iran have become more resilient, more united, and more backing of the government and the country in the wake of this invasion."